Recent data shows that the Ethereum network continues to experience significant growth in user activity and smart contract interactions. However, this expansionRecent data shows that the Ethereum network continues to experience significant growth in user activity and smart contract interactions. However, this expansion

CryptoQuant Predicts Where Ethereum (ETH) Could Trade By Q4 2026

2026/03/15 07:04
4 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Recent data shows that the Ethereum network continues to experience significant growth in user activity and smart contract interactions. However, this expansion has not translated into stronger market performance for the asset. Analysts at CryptoQuant believe the widening gap between network usage and price behavior could signal continued downside risk for Ethereum if current market conditions persist.

At the time of writing, Ethereum was trading around $2,073, showing a 2.6% loss during the previous 24 hours. The asset remains substantially below its most recent cycle peak.

CryptoQuant analyst Julio Moreno recently addressed the disconnect between Ethereum’s network metrics and its market valuation. According to Moreno, the current situation signals a structural imbalance in which blockchain activity expands while investor demand weakens.

He indicated that if the broader cryptocurrency market remains under pressure, Ethereum could move toward the $1,500 range. Based on his assessment, such a decline could occur toward the end of the third quarter or early in the fourth quarter unless there is a meaningful improvement in capital inflows into the asset.

Persistent Growth in Network Usage

Blockchain data collected by CryptoQuant shows that Ethereum continues to experience increasing levels of user engagement. The number of daily active addresses recently surpassed all previously recorded figures, exceeding the levels observed during the 2021 bull market.

Historically, significant increases in network participation have often been accompanied by upward price movements. Greater adoption generally suggests stronger demand for the asset required to pay transaction fees and interact with decentralized applications.

However, the current cycle has moved differently. Even though Ethereum’s network is recording unprecedented usage, its market price has not followed the same trajectory. Instead, ETH has declined by more than 50% from its previous cycle high.

CryptoQuant analysts describe this phenomenon as an “adoption paradox,” referring to the unusual situation in which rising blockchain activity coincides with declining asset value.

Smart Contract Activity Drives Transactions

One of the primary contributors to Ethereum’s expanding network metrics is the increasing use of smart contracts. These automated programs execute transactions and processes within decentralized applications without direct user input.

According to CryptoQuant, the number of internal contract calls reached a new peak last month. These calls represent interactions where smart contracts trigger additional actions within decentralized systems.

Multiple segments of the Ethereum ecosystem are responsible for this rise in activity. Decentralized finance applications, stablecoin transactions, and Layer-2 scaling networks built on Ethereum infrastructure have all contributed to the growth in automated processes.

Despite the increase in smart contract usage, analysts note that the connection between these activity metrics and price performance appears weaker than in previous market cycles.

Exchange Flows Indicate Continued Selling Pressure

Given that traditional on-chain indicators are currently less effective at predicting price direction, analysts are paying closer attention to exchange flow data. These metrics track the movement of assets into and out of trading platforms, which can provide insights into investor behavior.

CryptoQuant data shows that Ethereum inflows to exchanges remain relatively elevated when compared with Bitcoin. Assets transferred to exchanges are often prepared for potential sale, meaning higher inflows can indicate stronger selling pressure. This trend may partially explain why Ethereum has underperformed relative to Bitcoin in recent months.

Additional data also suggests that overall investment in Ethereum has weakened. CryptoQuant reported that the one-year change in Ethereum’s realized capitalization recently turned negative. This metric measures the net movement of capital entering or leaving the network.

A negative reading indicates that more capital is exiting the asset than entering it. Such conditions can weigh on price performance even if network activity remains strong.

According to Moreno, a reversal in Ethereum’s market trajectory would likely require two key developments. First, the asset would need to attract renewed capital inflows from investors. Second, the volume of ETH moving to exchanges would need to decline, which could reduce selling pressure.

Until these changes occur, analysts believe Ethereum may continue to face price challenges despite the network’s expanding usage and growing ecosystem.

Disclaimer: This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses.


Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, Telegram, and Google News

The post CryptoQuant Predicts Where Ethereum (ETH) Could Trade By Q4 2026 appeared first on Times Tabloid.

Market Opportunity
Polytrade Logo
Polytrade Price(TRADE)
$0.04131
$0.04131$0.04131
+0.04%
USD
Polytrade (TRADE) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28
Pi Network Community Leadership Program Opens Doors for New GCV Ambassadors

Pi Network Community Leadership Program Opens Doors for New GCV Ambassadors

    The Pi Network community is entering another stage of organizational development as new opportunities emerge for p
Share
Hokanews2026/03/15 22:16
U.S. Congressman Tells Senate to Pass House Crypto Bill or Step Aside – Inside the Clarity Act Standoff

U.S. Congressman Tells Senate to Pass House Crypto Bill or Step Aside – Inside the Clarity Act Standoff

Key Takeaways: Rep. French Hill is pushing the Senate to adopt the House-passed Clarity Act to break the stablecoin deadlock […] The post U.S. Congressman Tells
Share
Coindoo2026/03/15 22:15