Senator Bato dela Rosa is still currently a senator, although he has been absent from the Senate since November 11, 2025Senator Bato dela Rosa is still currently a senator, although he has been absent from the Senate since November 11, 2025

FACT CHECK: Bato dela Rosa not removed from Senate

2026/03/16 14:10
3 min read
For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com

Claim: Senator Ronald “Bato” dela Rosa has been expelled from the Senate.

Rating: FALSE

Why we fact-checked this: The claim can be found in several Facebook posts, two of them with substantial interactions — a post on March 9 from the page “Ritz East” with around 1,300 reactions, 504 comments, and 48 shares as of writing; and a post on March 10 from the page “Bryan Tayo Panday” with 869 reactions, 894 comments, and 24 shares as of writing. 

Other Facebook pages that spread the claim include “Mylene,” “Che Ronqz,” and “Track Vintage Hub.”

The posts say Dela Rosa has been removed from the Senate after four months of absence at the upper chamber.

The facts: Dela Rosa has not been removed from the Senate; he is still a senator of the Philippines. There are no official reports of his removal from his elective post. 

The Facebook posts containing the claim also did not include any evidence of Dela Rosa’s supposed removal from the Senate.

Article VI, Section 16 of the Philippine Constitution states how a senator can be removed from office: “Each House may determine the rules of its proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly behavior, and, with the concurrence of two-thirds of all its Members, suspend or expel a Member. A penalty of suspension, when imposed, shall not exceed sixty days.” 

Senate rules also have provisions on expelling any of its members, such as in some cases of disorderly behavior (Rule XXXIV, Section 97) or violating confidentiality (Rule XLVIII, Section 129). 

Dela Rosa’s absence: Dela Rosa has been absent from Senate sessions since November 11, 2025, coinciding with the circulation of reports of a supposed warrant of arrest against him from the International Criminal Court (ICC) for being an “indirect co-perpetrator” in the crimes against humanity case of former president Rodrigo Duterte. (READ: ICC warrant out vs Bato dela Rosa?; SC denies Bato’s request to compel Remulla to release ICC warrant) 

Subsequently, he was officially mentioned in an ICC document dated February 14, 2026, as one of the “indirect co-perpetrators.” (READ: ICC names Dela Rosa, Bong Go, Aguirre among 8 of Duterte’s co-perpetrators)

As of writing, however, the supposed warrant against Dela Rosa is unconfirmed.

Because of Dela Rosa’s continued absence in the upper chamber, he has lost nearly all of his committee memberships in the Senate.

Previous related fact-checks: Rappler has published numerous fact-checks of false claims pertaining to the removal of public officials from various positions. Here are examples published this 2026:

  • FACT CHECK: Ombudsman Remulla still in office, not dismissed by Supreme Court (March 9, 2026)
  • FACT CHECK: No Supreme Court order expelling Abante from House (February 23, 2026)
  • FACT CHECK: Sandro Marcos remains House majority leader; no SC ruling against him (February 19, 2026)
  • FACT CHECK: Sotto not ousted as Senate president (February 10, 2026)
  • FACT CHECK: Marcos remains president; no transfer of power to Sara Duterte (January 8, 2026)

  Percival Bueser/Rappler.com

Percival Bueser is a graduate of Rappler’s fact-checking mentorship program. This fact check was reviewed by a member of Rappler’s research team and a senior editor. Learn more about Rappler’s fact-checking mentorship program here.

Keep us aware of suspicious Facebook pages, groups, accounts, websites, articles, or photos in your network by contacting us at factcheck@rappler.com. Let us battle disinformation one Fact Check at a time.

Market Opportunity
Notcoin Logo
Notcoin Price(NOT)
$0.0004309
$0.0004309$0.0004309
+1.86%
USD
Notcoin (NOT) Live Price Chart
Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

And the Big Day Has Arrived: The Anticipated News for XRP and Dogecoin Tomorrow

And the Big Day Has Arrived: The Anticipated News for XRP and Dogecoin Tomorrow

The first-ever ETFs for XRP and Dogecoin are expected to launch in the US tomorrow. Here's what you need to know. Continue Reading: And the Big Day Has Arrived: The Anticipated News for XRP and Dogecoin Tomorrow
Share
Coinstats2025/09/18 04:33
Swiss Franc Intervention: Critical Analysis of SNB’s 2025 Policy and Safe-Haven Resilience

Swiss Franc Intervention: Critical Analysis of SNB’s 2025 Policy and Safe-Haven Resilience

BitcoinWorld Swiss Franc Intervention: Critical Analysis of SNB’s 2025 Policy and Safe-Haven Resilience ZURICH, March 2025 – The Swiss National Bank faces mounting
Share
bitcoinworld2026/03/16 23:10
Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future

The post Cashing In On University Patents Means Giving Up On Our Innovation Future appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. “It’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress,” writes Pipes. Getty Images Washington is addicted to taxing success. Now, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick is floating a plan to skim half the patent earnings from inventions developed at universities with federal funding. It’s being sold as a way to shore up programs like Social Security. In reality, it’s a raid on American innovation that would deliver pennies to the Treasury while kneecapping the very engine of our economic and medical progress. Yes, taxpayer dollars support early-stage research. But the real payoff comes later—in the jobs created, cures discovered, and industries launched when universities and private industry turn those discoveries into real products. By comparison, the sums at stake in patent licensing are trivial. Universities collectively earn only about $3.6 billion annually in patent income—less than the federal government spends on Social Security in a single day. Even confiscating half would barely register against a $6 trillion federal budget. And yet the damage from such a policy would be anything but trivial. The true return on taxpayer investment isn’t in licensing checks sent to Washington, but in the downstream economic activity that federally supported research unleashes. Thanks to the bipartisan Bayh-Dole Act of 1980, universities and private industry have powerful incentives to translate early-stage discoveries into real-world products. Before Bayh-Dole, the government hoarded patents from federally funded research, and fewer than 5% were ever licensed. Once universities could own and license their own inventions, innovation exploded. The result has been one of the best returns on investment in government history. Since 1996, university research has added nearly $2 trillion to U.S. industrial output, supported 6.5 million jobs, and launched more than 19,000 startups. Those companies pay…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 03:26