The post SEC and CFTC Introduce Crypto Classification Framework appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SEC and CFTC issued a framework that identified various digitalThe post SEC and CFTC Introduce Crypto Classification Framework appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SEC and CFTC issued a framework that identified various digital

SEC and CFTC Introduce Crypto Classification Framework

For feedback or concerns regarding this content, please contact us at crypto.news@mexc.com
  • SEC and CFTC issued a framework that identified various digital assets that qualify as securities or commodities.
  • The guidelines seek to eliminate regulatory uncertainty in the cryptocurrency space.

The Securities Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission issued guidelines that identified various digital assets under federal regulatory laws. The guidelines identified various crypto tokens, such as digital commodities, collectibles, tools, stablecoins, and digital securities.

This guidance clarified that the Securities and Exchange Commission regulates digital securities and tokenized traditional securities under its oversight rules. Regulators explained that they do not consider most crypto assets as securities unless issuers present them as investment contracts to investors. SEC Chairman Paul Atkins explained that “This interpretation will provide market participants with a clear understanding” of the regulations. Chairman Rostin Behnam of the CFTC explained that the regulators are trying to provide clear and harmonized rules.

                                                      Source: Bloomberg

New Rules Address Staking, Airdrops, and Market Structure

This framework also clarified the regulations regarding the securities laws applicable to staking, airdrops, mining, and other blockchain-based token distribution mechanisms across the markets. Regulators explained how each of these mechanisms is included in the existing financial laws and regulations while addressing the issues related to compliance and regulations.

The regulators clarified that non-security digital assets have the potential to be classified as securities if the issuers market them with expected profits based on their efforts. They emphasized that promotional activities are essential in defining the way regulators classify digital assets. This emphasizes the significance of transparency in value propositions communicated by project teams to potential investors.

Stablecoins and Digital Commodities Receive Regulatory Clarity

The agencies have removed certain forms of stablecoins and digital commodities from the list of securities in the updated framework of the regulatory interpretation. They clarified that the assets are used as payment instruments and are classified as commodities. This is a welcome move for certain parts of the crypto market that use stable assets for transactions.

They also pointed out that the framework addresses the long-standing industry call for greater clarity in the rapidly changing digital asset markets. They also pointed out that the initiative is consistent with the efforts made to reduce the overlap of regulations and the streamlining of enforcement regimes across the jurisdictions. Regulators also pointed out that the initiative promotes innovation with robust investor protection standards in the cryptocurrency market.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Arizona Files Criminal Charges Against Kalshi Over Illegal Gambling Allegations

Source: https://thenewscrypto.com/sec-and-cftc-introduce-crypto-classification-framework/

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact crypto.news@mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.

You May Also Like

XAG/USD struggles near $75.50 on firm hopes of Fed’s extended pause

XAG/USD struggles near $75.50 on firm hopes of Fed’s extended pause

The post XAG/USD struggles near $75.50 on firm hopes of Fed’s extended pause appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Silver price (XAG/USD) struggles to gain ground
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/19 14:04
WLFI Price Drops 4% Despite New Governance Proposal

WLFI Price Drops 4% Despite New Governance Proposal

The post WLFI Price Drops 4% Despite New Governance Proposal appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Key Highlights World Liberty Financial (WLFI) price dropped by
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2026/03/19 14:19
The $40 Million ‘Free Money’ Glitch in Crypto Prediction Markets

The $40 Million ‘Free Money’ Glitch in Crypto Prediction Markets

The post The $40 Million ‘Free Money’ Glitch in Crypto Prediction Markets appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. In brief Researchers found $40 million in “risk-free” profits from mispriced markets on Polymarket in one year. Prices on some markets didn’t add up to 100%, letting traders lock in guaranteed gains. The same inefficiencies likely exist on other platforms like Myriad and Kalshi, though arbitrageurs help correct them. A new academic paper suggests there’s been a steady stream of “free money” lying around on Polymarket—and smart traders have been scooping it up. The paper, Unravelling the Probabilistic Forest: Arbitrage in Prediction Markets, is the most detailed look yet at how mispricing creeps into crypto’s most popular prediction platform. The researchers combed through a year of data, from April 2024 to April 2025, and found thousands of instances where market prices simply didn’t add up. In some cases, the prices of “Yes” and “No” shares in a single market didn’t sum to one dollar as they theoretically should, creating a risk-free profit for anyone quick enough to pounce.  In other cases, the mispricing was more subtle, involving logically related markets. For example, a market on “Trump wins the presidency” might trade at very different odds than “Republican wins the presidency,” even though those outcomes are tightly linked. By buying and selling combinations of these contracts, a savvy trader could lock in a profit no matter what happens. The researchers estimate more than $40 million in profits have already been pulled from the system by arbitrageurs, traders who specialize in sniffing out and exploiting these kinds of inconsistencies. Far from being a theoretical curiosity, this is a live and lucrative business model. Is this pattern true across all prediction markets? What’s striking is how common these opportunities are. The study found more than 7,000 markets with measurable mispricing, many in highly liquid, closely watched contracts. “Prediction markets are often treated…
Share
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 14:34