Will Leshner turn LQR House into the MicroStrategy of DeFi? Written by: TechFlow LQR House, a publicly traded liquor retailer located in Miami Beach, Florida, has not been doing wellWill Leshner turn LQR House into the MicroStrategy of DeFi? Written by: TechFlow LQR House, a publicly traded liquor retailer located in Miami Beach, Florida, has not been doing well

The DeFi version of MicroStrategy is born? A $2 million capital gamble and a boardroom battle

2025/07/18 12:00

Will Leshner turn LQR House into the MicroStrategy of DeFi?

Written by: TechFlow

LQR House, a publicly traded liquor retailer located in Miami Beach, Florida, has not been doing well lately.

On July 14, 2025, documents from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) showed that Compound founder Robert Leshner used his personal funds to purchase approximately 600,000 shares of Nasdaq-listed company LQR House Inc. (LQR), with a shareholding ratio of 56.9%, making him the largest shareholder.

According to the Form 13D filed, Leshner's total investment was approximately $2.03 million, with some of the shares purchased through Interactive Brokers at $3.77 per share.

The news caused LQR House shares to rise 45% in trading on Monday and reached $10 before the close of trading on Wednesday, a three-fold increase from the purchase price.

However, Leshner's acquisition was not smooth sailing, and soon a capital offensive and defensive drama over control was staged with the board of directors.

The battle of control and anti-control

"I purchased a controlling stake in $YHC, a liquor company with a low market value and a somewhat shady history. My plan is to replace the board of directors and help the company explore new strategies." On July 14, Leshner revealed his "intention to change people" on the day of the SEC announcement and reminded retail investors of the risks: "I have not done extensive due diligence, and there are signs that the company is plotting something fishy. But please be extra careful with any low-market-value company. I could lose all my investment, and so could you."

According to the SEC filing, Leshner plans to propose the removal of all current board members and nominate a new team of directors, either by written consent or by convening a special meeting of shareholders, in accordance with the company's articles of association and Nevada law.

Leshner also stressed that no specific agreements have been reached with other shareholders or third parties, but further communication and collaboration with relevant parties in the future is not ruled out.

However, Leshner's plan seemed to have hit a snag.

On July 14, LQR House submitted a supplement to its prospectus to the SEC. According to the document, LQR House stated that it would increase the number of shares that could be offered and sold through sales agents to US$46 million, which does not include US$2,700 worth of shares sold under the ATM agreement as of the date of the supplement.

Normally, ATM additional issuance is a flexible means of financing for listed companies, but at the current sensitive moment, it obviously has a deeper meaning.

After reading the supplementary materials, Leshner said: "I disagree with LQR House's approach to ATM issuance (selling stocks). I think it is ineffective and I am consulting a lawyer." The next day, on July 15, LQR House shareholder Kingbird Ventures LLC filed a lawsuit in a Florida court, accusing CEO Sean Dollinger and board members of abusing fiduciary responsibilities, misappropriating assets, and violating the company's articles of association; and requested the court to freeze certain share changes, suspend the board of directors' power, and prevent "control hijacking."

If the court rules for a temporary restraining order (TRO) or injunction, Leshner's plan to call a special shareholder meeting to remove the current directors could be temporarily shelved.

In addition, according to sources, the company may try to fight back with a "poison pill." The so-called "poison pill plan" means that when a shareholder's shareholding ratio reaches or exceeds the preset "trigger line," the company will automatically issue new shares to other shareholders (excluding the acquirer) at a significantly discounted price, thereby diluting the acquirer's shareholding ratio, increasing the acquisition cost, or even forcing it to give up.

But Leshner's supporters aren't far behind.

On July 16, 2025, Makesy Capital announced the acquisition of 0.1% of LQR House's shares and pledged to support Leshner's reforms. At the same time, Makesy Capital also launched an online campaign against LQR House CEO Sean Dollinger, saying that this would serve as a warning to CEOs of listed companies who treat the public market and the investing public as private piggy banks.

As of press time, this battle of control and counter-control is still going on intensely, with both sides cautiously testing the waters, guarding against the possibility that any careless decision may have negative effects.

Why LQR House?

LQR House is a Nasdaq small-cap company whose market value was once less than $3 million. Even after its recent surge, its current market value is only around $11 million.

At first glance, this looks like a speculative game of a micro-cap concept stock, but the entry of Robert Leshner offers another possibility.

As the founder of Compound, Leshner was once a pioneer in on-chain finance. He led Compound to set off the DeFi lending trend, and has also actively explored the combination of DAO and RWA in the past two years. As crypto capital continues to seek deep integration with traditional markets and crypto stocks are rising, this DeFi pioneer with a technical background chose to bet on LQR House. There may be three reasons:

First, the identity of a listed company. LQR House has the qualification to be listed on Nasdaq, and the compliance channel has been opened. For crypto players who want to get involved in the traditional capital market, this type of "lightweight" listed company has unique strategic value. Bypassing the high costs required for IPO or SPAC, with the help of the ready-made capital market channel, it is easier to become a springboard for funds, trust and voice.

Secondly, the threshold for controlling shares is low and the equity structure is loose. LQR House has dispersed equity and a small circulating stock, which makes it easy for external capital to quickly gain control. This is very attractive to investors who want to build a cross-border capital platform. Leshner used $2.03 million to acquire 56.9% of the controlling stake, which is far more cost-effective than most capital operation cases.

Finally, the company itself has made initial contact with the crypto business. According to CoinDesk, LQR House announced that it would inject $1 million in Bitcoin into its treasury and enable crypto payment services. This means that it has taken a step forward in connecting digital assets with traditional retail, and has the foundation to expand into the crypto capital ecosystem.

Is a Compound version of MicroStrategy coming?

Since MicroStrategy included Bitcoin in its balance sheet and SBET became the new darling of the stock market, the global capital market has been swept by the trend of "listed companies holding cash."

The question that the market is most concerned about is: Will Leshner turn LQR House into the MicroStrategy of the DeFi field? Will he incorporate $COMP or even crypto lending business into LQR House to form a new asset reserve and capital operation model?

Of course, there is one thing that may be overlooked by everyone. In addition to being the founder of Compound, Leshner’s latest title is the founder of Superstate.

Superstate, a company founded in 2023, is targeting the track of on-chain funds and compliant tokenized assets.

Unlike Compound, which is aimed at pure DeFi users, Superstate is committed to providing institutional investors with traditional asset funds based on blockchain. Its first product is a tokenized version of the "Short-Term U.S. Treasury Bond Fund", and its service targets directly the traditional financial market.

The keywords that Superstate has always emphasized are: on-chain compliance, asset tokenization, and institution-friendly. Its ambition is to open up the connection channel between traditional finance and on-chain assets.

This may be Leshner's potential layout direction for LQR House.

As a ready-made Nasdaq listing platform, LQR House has a "ticket" to the traditional financial market and can provide a display window for the public capital market for Superstate's compliant products, RWA business or on-chain funds.

The combination of the two means that it is possible to create a "listing platform under Superstate", use the public market to attract on-chain products, and provide a legal and compliant secondary market channel for Superstate's fund raising.

In addition, LQR House has previously been involved in crypto payments and digital asset layout, and can also serve as a "test field" for Superstate products or a channel for ecological application landing.

This is slightly different from the logic of MicroStrategy writing Bitcoin into its financial statements and SharpLink Gaming reserving Ethereum. What Leshner may want to do is to embed on-chain funds and tokenized assets into the capital operations of listed companies.

Truly bring "on-chain capital" into the traditional financial framework and create a compliant DeFi-TradFi linkage model.

This will be a deeper experiment.

It is not only a story of holding currency, but also a story of capital.

Disclaimer: The articles reposted on this site are sourced from public platforms and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not necessarily reflect the views of MEXC. All rights remain with the original authors. If you believe any content infringes on third-party rights, please contact service@support.mexc.com for removal. MEXC makes no guarantees regarding the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the content and is not responsible for any actions taken based on the information provided. The content does not constitute financial, legal, or other professional advice, nor should it be considered a recommendation or endorsement by MEXC.
Share Insights

You May Also Like

The End of Fragmentation: Towards a Coherent Ethereum

The End of Fragmentation: Towards a Coherent Ethereum

Author: Prince Compiled by: Block unicorn Ethereum's initial vision was a permissionless, infinitely open platform where anyone with an idea could participate. Its principle is simple: a world computer sharing a single global state view. Ethereum's value lies in the fact that anyone can build useful applications, and that all applications are interconnected. As Ethereum evolves, its scaling roadmap brings both new opportunities and challenges. New closed ecosystems are beginning to emerge. Entrepreneurs seek higher performance or practical ways to make their products stand out. For some developers, the simplest way to achieve this is to create their own blockchain ecosystem. This ecosystem expands in almost every possible direction: new blockchains are launched (horizontal growth), and aggregations are introduced to expand the underlying layers (vertical growth). Other teams choose to build their own dedicated execution and consensus layers (application-specific blockchains) to meet the needs of their projects. Each expansion, viewed individually, is a reasonable decision. But from a broader perspective, this continuous expansion is beginning to undermine the belief that Ethereum will one day become the "world computer." Today, the same assets exist on multiple platforms and in multiple forms. The same exchanges or lending markets appear on every chain. The permissionless nature remains, but the coordination mechanisms are beginning to disappear. As state, assets, liquidity, and applications become increasingly fragmented, what was once an infinite garden is starting to resemble a complex maze. The real cost of fragmentation Fragmentation has not only created technical obstacles, but it has also changed how developers feel when choosing to build applications. The products delivered by each team initially functioned as expected. However, with increasing fragmentation, these teams were forced to migrate identical applications to other chains in order to retain existing users. Each new deployment seemed like progress, but for most developers, it felt like starting from scratch. Liquidity gradually eroded, and users left with it. Ethereum continues to grow and thrive, but it has gradually lost its community cohesion. Although the ecosystem remains active and continues to grow, individual interests have begun to take precedence over coordination and connection. This boundless garden is beginning to show signs of overgrowth and neglect. No one did anything wrong. Everyone followed the incentive mechanism. Over time, all that remained was exhaustion. Abundance was brought without permission, yet within this abundance, the very foundation that once held everything together began to crumble. Return of coherence MegaETH represents Ethereum's first real opportunity to scale block space supply to meet demand within a single execution environment. Currently, the L2 block space market is congested. Most projects are vying for the same user base, offering largely similar block space. Throughput bottlenecks persist, and high activity on individual sequencers artificially inflates transaction costs. Despite significant technological advancements, only a handful of scaling solutions have truly improved the user and developer experience. MegaETH aims to change that. It is one of the closest attempts to realizing Ethereum's original vision—building a world computer. By providing an execution environment with latency below 10 milliseconds, gigabit gas caps, and ultra-low-cost transactions, the MegaETH team is striving to achieve the vision of a world computer. All data is processed on a single shared state (ignoring privacy concerns for now), and real-time execution should be a guiding light for our industry and the only way we can truly compete with Web 2.0. As a founder building on MegaETH, what impressed me most wasn't the speed or millisecond-level latency, but rather that after many years, all applications built on Ethereum can finally connect and stay in sync, and at a low cost with short wait times. When all contracts and transactions reside in the same state machine, complex coordination mechanisms become simple again. Developers no longer need to struggle with latency or spend time optimizing contracts to improve gas efficiency; users no longer need to worry about which "version" of network they are transacting on. This is what MegaETH means by "Big Sequencer Energy": Ethereum possesses a high-performance execution layer built specifically for real-time applications. For the first time in years, users can build applications within the Ethereum execution environment without worrying about their location. All users can once again share the same execution environment, enabling latency-sensitive applications such as high-frequency trading, on-chain order books, real-time lending, and fully on-chain multiplayer games—features currently impossible due to Ethereum's resource limitations. Enter: MegaMafia In the context of MegaETH, those who experienced fragmentation are beginning to rebuild. We all know what we lost when everything fell apart. Now, the system is finally able to stay in sync, and it feels like moving forward rather than sideways. Each team works on a different level: transactions, credit, infrastructure, gaming, and more. But their goal is the same: to make Ethereum a unified whole again. MegaETH provides that opportunity, and MegaMafia has given it shape. The focus now is no longer on deploying more of the same applications, but on rebuilding the infrastructure so that the parts that are already working well can finally work together. Avon's role in world computing Avon brought the same concept to the credit market. Of all DeFi categories, lending is most severely affected by fragmentation. Each protocol operates on different versions of the same concept. Each market has its own liquidity, rules, and risks. Anyone who's used these markets knows the feeling. You check interest rates on one app, then compare them on another, and still don't know which is more reliable. Liquidity stagnates because it can't flow between different protocols. Avon introduces a coordination layer instead of deploying another pool of funds. Its order book connects different strategies (independent markets), enabling them to respond to each other in real time. You can think of it as many pools of funds connected through a shared layer (i.e., the order book). When one changes, the others are aware of it. Over time, the lending market will once again function as a single, interconnected market. Liquidity will flow to where the most competitive conditions are available. Borrowers will obtain the most competitive interest rates possible. Coordination is not just about optimizing interest rates or controlling them. More importantly, it's about providing a unified perspective on lending during market fluctuations. Towards a coherent Ethereum Ethereum doesn't need another chain. It needs a central hub where people gather and maintain Ethereum. MegaETH provides the trading venue. MegaMafia will provide the trading power. Avon will provide the coordination layer, enabling funds to flow within the system. Ethereum has faced fragmentation issues for the past few years; we believe MegaETH will drive Ethereum toward realizing its vision of becoming a world computer and reaching an unprecedented scale. As Ethereum begins to regain its rhythm, MegaETH will ensure that builders can do this at a near-infinite scale.
Share
PANews2025/10/31 14:00
Revolut Stablecoin Swap: A Game-Changer for Digital Asset Transfers

Revolut Stablecoin Swap: A Game-Changer for Digital Asset Transfers

BitcoinWorld Revolut Stablecoin Swap: A Game-Changer for Digital Asset Transfers The world of digital finance is constantly evolving, and leading neobanks like Revolut are at the forefront of this transformation. A significant development has just emerged: Revolut has launched an innovative Revolut stablecoin swap feature, allowing users to seamlessly exchange U.S. dollars for popular stablecoins like USDT and USDC. This move is poised to simplify digital asset transactions for millions. What Does the New Revolut Stablecoin Swap Entail? Revolut, known for its versatile financial services, has introduced a game-changing one-to-one swap functionality. This allows users to convert their U.S. dollars directly into stablecoins. The service specifically supports Tether (USDT) and USD Coin (USDC). These are two of the most widely used stablecoins, pegged directly to the U.S. dollar, offering stability in the volatile crypto market. Crucially, this swap operates across six major blockchains, including Ethereum, Solana, and Tron, providing broad accessibility and flexibility. One of the most attractive aspects? Users can swap up to an impressive $578,000 into stablecoins within a 30-day period, all completely free of fees or spread. This eliminates a common barrier for those looking to engage with digital assets. Why is Revolut’s Stablecoin Swap a Game-Changer for Users? This new feature isn’t just a minor update; it’s a significant step towards mainstream crypto adoption. It bridges the gap between traditional fiat currency and the burgeoning world of decentralized finance (DeFi). Seamless Access: For many, acquiring stablecoins often involves navigating complex crypto exchanges, dealing with various fees, and understanding different trading pairs. Revolut simplifies this process dramatically. Cost-Efficiency: The absence of fees and spread on these swaps means users retain the full value of their conversion, making it an incredibly attractive option for both casual users and those with larger transaction volumes. Enhanced Utility: Stablecoins are vital for various crypto activities, from trading and lending to cross-border remittances. By making them easily accessible, Revolut empowers its users to participate more actively in the digital economy. This Revolut stablecoin swap enhances the utility of their platform. How Can You Utilize the Revolut Stablecoin Swap Effectively? Leveraging this new feature is straightforward for existing Revolut users. The integration within the familiar Revolut app ensures a user-friendly experience. Actionable Insight: If you’re planning to engage in crypto trading or need to send funds internationally using stablecoins, this feature provides a direct and economical route. Consider the 30-day limit of $578,000. While generous, it’s an important detail for high-volume users to keep in mind. This limit helps manage risk and maintain platform stability. Revolut’s strong regulatory standing as a London-based neobank also adds a layer of trust and security, crucial for users venturing into digital assets. This adherence to regulations supports the EEAT principles of expertise, authoritativeness, and trustworthiness. The Revolut stablecoin swap is built on a foundation of trust. What’s Next for Digital Finance with Revolut Stablecoin Swap? The introduction of the Revolut stablecoin swap could set a new standard for how traditional financial institutions interact with cryptocurrencies. It signals a growing acceptance and integration of digital assets into everyday banking. This move by Revolut may encourage other neobanks and traditional banks to explore similar offerings, fostering greater competition and innovation in the digital finance space. The future could see an expansion of supported stablecoins or even other cryptocurrencies, further broadening the scope of Revolut’s digital asset services. Ultimately, features like this push us closer to a future where digital currencies are as easy to use and access as traditional fiat, enabling more efficient and inclusive financial systems globally. Revolut’s new 1:1 USD-to-stablecoin swap feature is a significant milestone, offering unparalleled ease, cost-efficiency, and accessibility for digital asset transactions. By supporting major stablecoins across multiple blockchains with zero fees, Revolut is not just simplifying crypto for its users but also accelerating the convergence of traditional and decentralized finance. This innovative step solidifies Revolut’s position as a forward-thinking leader in the global financial landscape. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) What is the Revolut stablecoin swap feature?It allows Revolut users to exchange U.S. dollars for stablecoins like USDT and USDC on a 1:1 basis, without fees or spread, across six different blockchains. Which stablecoins and blockchains are supported?The service supports USDT (Tether) and USDC (USD Coin) on blockchains including Ethereum, Solana, and Tron. Are there any fees for using the swap feature?No, Revolut offers this 1:1 swap completely free of fees and spread. Is there a limit to how much I can swap?Yes, users can swap up to $578,000 into stablecoins within a 30-day rolling period. Why is this feature important for crypto users?It simplifies access to stablecoins, reduces transaction costs, and provides a secure, regulated platform for engaging with digital assets, bridging traditional finance with the crypto world. Found this article insightful? Share it with your friends and fellow crypto enthusiasts on social media to spread the word about Revolut’s exciting new stablecoin swap feature! To learn more about the latest crypto market trends, explore our article on key developments shaping stablecoin institutional adoption. This post Revolut Stablecoin Swap: A Game-Changer for Digital Asset Transfers first appeared on BitcoinWorld.
Share
Coinstats2025/10/31 13:45